As the name suggests, Nashville Is Talking is a blog devoted to the daily conversation that takes place in and around the Greater Nashville community. If it’s being discussed in Music City, we hope you’ll find it here.
NIT has pretensions of reportage. Rare as blogs go, I know, but utterly ordinary in the world of local news, where KKK rallies are covered without anyone thinking the coverage tantamount to an endorsement. This goes without saying ... as does the fact that daily conversations in Tennessee (as everywhere) often violate whatever passes for social decorum today.
Case in point: any conversation in which the folks who write here participate likely contains material liberals find offensive. As two of the authors of that site are from Nashville, it qualifies as something "being discussed in Music City," so Gilbert regularly—one could say dutifully—linked to it. So when one of its authors posted a disgustingly racist obituary for the liberal blogger Steve Gilliard, she linked to it ... just as she earlier linked to other local reactions to his death. Such is the nature of reportage.
Today she tendered her resignation on account of the response of the response to her dutiful post by non-readers of NIT. One of those non-readers, Jesus' General, used his not inconsiderable influence to inform Gilbert's employers that she had done her job:
Now I know your blogger, Brittney, isn't the author of those lines, but she deserves a lot of credit for republishing it without comment and thereby repackaging it as a WKRN 2 Nashville product.
When she responded that her link wasn't an endorsement, the General added:
Apparently, Brittney is just plain fucking stupid. I'm told she posted it to expose the original blogger's hatred.
She need not have even claimed that she wanted "to expose the original blogger's hatred," since NIT was intended to be a clearinghouse for information concerning what Nashville is talking about. Were I paid to write about what bloggers in Orange County were writing, I'd frequently link to material I found offensive. Not because I approve of it—I find much of the conversation on local Orange County blogs offensive—but because I had been hired to to write about what bloggers in Orange County were writing.
From what I can gather, Gilbert put her own politics aside in order to do her job. People who publish with Blogger? No such constraints. They're free to link to whatever and whomever they choose. Unsurprisingly then, their default logic is link-as-endorsement. Had Jesus' General and its readers bothered to read NIT on its own terms—had they bothered to understand the context of the remarks instead of relying inapplicable conventions, Gilbert wouldn't have been vilified and wouldn't have been forced to resign.
Context is important. Without it, distortions abound. (I say this in my official capacity as literary scholar.) Normally such statements are merely academic; in this case, someone lost her job not because of what she had written, but because of what people who lacked knowledge of its context and the desire to discover it—a damning combination—misinterpreted it. Not only that, they misinterpreters now insist that their ignorance is Gilbert's fault ... just as they'll insist their misprision of this post's title will be mine. The fact that it comes from The Autobiography of Miss Jane Pittman will not merely escape them, they'll insist that their unfamiliarity with the conventions of Acephalous justifies their misplaced outrage.
Or maybe it won't. Maybe the obviousness of the context here will convince them to back off. I have my doubts, but what more can you do than doing what you can?