This is a terrible idea. I shouldn't be posting about my job search under my own name. How stupid am I?
Not that stupid.
But there are some aspects of the job search which—being incapable of offending anyone—can be written about. Take the application process. In order to apply to similar entry-level positions at similar institutions, I must:
- write a five-page cover letter
- write a ten-page cover letter
- write a 250 word abstract
- write a 1,000 word abstract
- write a 4 page statement of pedagogical philosophy
- write a 6 page statement of pedagogical philosophy
- write a 10 page statement of pedagogical philosophy
- hack a dissertation chapter into a 15 page writing sample
- hack a dissertation chapter into a 20 page writing sample
- hack a dissertation chapter into a 25 page writing sample
And these are the plates I'm juggling today. Tomorrow they'll toss a chainsaw at me.
Saturday they'll set on fire.
On Sunday, me, my plates and a blazing chainsaw will be on a unicycle.
Monday will witness my unicycle on a trapeze wire.
Come Tuesday, a bear on a bicycle will follow me out on the wire.
On Wednesday, they'll hand him a chainsaw.
Thursday they'll set his on fire too.
By Friday I'll be chopped and charred.
Come Saturday I'll be bear scat.
Or so it feels. I understand the different needs of different programs demand different applications. I even understand that the ability to fill out a particular application competently is a sign to some hiring committees that you fit the needs of their particular institution. At least in theory. I wonder, though, how many applications are binned because some types of dissertations are more easily condensed or expanded. Because mine fits in this category:
I find it quite easy to remove large chunks of ancillary material—digressions which relate more to discussions in other chapters, or whose provenance is limited to scholars working in a particular sub-discipline—or limit the types of digressions based on the sort of job I'm applying to.
So, for example, with the London chapter I can remove the large chunks of intellectual history and presented a streamlined literary analysis for Institution X or widen my gyre to include early British or Irish modernist works by reinserting a bit about Shaw and Lamarckism for Institution Y. Not because I'm more qualified (not that I want to go there again), but because I wrote a dissertation which allows me to do so.
Meaning I may not be the best candidate for a particular job. (Of course, this implies my dissertation is good and that I'm not merely streamlining crap. I may well be. At some point, I've been told, I'll be able to assess the quality of my dissertation. I've not yet reached that point.)











In history, we're less likely to need a writing sample in the first phase (about a third of the schools ask for it up front, maybe less), but we are often asked for something like a research prospectus, outlining our research and publishing plans for the next 5-10 years.
I've never seen a request for a teaching philosophy statement with a specific page length, though I have seen some page-length caps on those. Mine was two pages, though I had a one-page version when it was necessary.
Having been on the other side of this particular process, I can say with great confidence that the idea of reading a whole stack of ten-page pedagogical statements chills me to the bone. They're all the same! Even mine, which I start by claiming not to have a pedagogical philosophy, is essentially indistinguishable from 98% of the rest of them. There's no bleeping way anyone can write 5-10 pages on teaching without masses of boilerplate, jargon and fluff.....
That said, if you want someone to look at your stuff with an outsider's eye (I have served as an outside member on English hires), you've got my email.
Posted by: Ahistoricality | Thursday, 16 October 2008 at 06:57 PM
Now now, you exaggerate a tad, particularly on those cover letter lengths: for instance, I have never heard of them handing the bear a chainsaw, much less a flaming one, and I have been applying for professorial jobs since their inception in this country back in 1789. You really wouldn't want to dissuade any of the eager young grad students currently storming the barricades of grad school, now, would you.
BTW, how is your field's job list looking this year? Like Death Valley or the balmy paradise of Joshua Tree and its occasional tumbleweed?
Posted by: Sisyphus | Thursday, 16 October 2008 at 07:00 PM
Oh, the joys that await me on the other side! Best of luck.
Posted by: sdc | Friday, 17 October 2008 at 06:24 AM
You think this is fun. Just wait for the phone call asking you to come interview later this week in Nowheresville, New Hampshire. Could you please skip teaching Wed-Fri, prepare a lecture on a class you just now heard of and put the flight with two layovers on your own credit card before driving yourself in a cheap rental the last six hours to a motel for four hours of sleep before your 7:45 interrog... I mean, interview with the Board of Trustees and the school's lawyer. Give me the flaming chainsaws any day!
Posted by: JP | Friday, 17 October 2008 at 11:19 AM
You came close, Dr Kaufmann, but the appointment committee has decided to offer the job to the bear on the bicycle.
Posted by: Adam Roberts | Friday, 17 October 2008 at 12:52 PM
my stomach hurts for you. i, for one, think your diss sounds fascinating...send it my way!
for what it is worth, i think you can far more easily see what needs to be done to make diss a monograph, so in that respect, i guess you know more what is good.
Posted by: adjunct whore | Friday, 17 October 2008 at 03:40 PM
Oooh, I know you're hyperbolizing (it's 1 AM, I can invent words), but those fantasy page lengths you've conjured up for items 1-2 and 5-7? Speaking as a veteran of several search committees, all I can say is: No. Please no. For the love of all that's unholy, no. I really have read cover letters than have gone on for three pages or more, and can't remember any of the writers making it past the first round. If you're applying for entry-level assistant professorships, there's no reason for your cover letter to be longer than two pages, no matter what sort of job is in question. That is, unless you've already had J. Hillis Miller's career. (You can keep the three-to-five page letters in reserve for your application to be an outside chair, twenty or thirty years down the road.)
Posted by: Miriam | Saturday, 18 October 2008 at 10:12 PM