This guy:
Because he also saw something terrible happen at a theater. The only person who thinks that guy would support filling the air of a crowded theater with crossfire would be a good idea would be the one who drew him.
« Glenn Reynolds Demonstrates How to Avoid Politicizing a Tragedy | Main | Initial verdict on The Dark Knight Rises: »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c2df453ef017616a2f02a970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference You know who wouldn’t mind watching a film in a gun-free zone?:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
'Course, 108 pages earlier, Batman straight-up shoots a Mutant, point-blank, in the face with a machine gun.
Posted by: Finenessandaccuracy.wordpress.com | Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 06:12 PM
"Rubber bullets. Honest."
Posted by: Craigo | Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 06:30 PM
Batman straight-up shoots a Mutant, point-blank, in the face with a machine gun.
Old Batman, who was holding a child and had no other way to defend himself. That's different, damn it.
Posted by: SEK | Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 06:31 PM
Technically, the Mutant was holding the child (and holding a gun to said child's head), but I don't think Batman gets any less old as the book progresses...
Posted by: Finenessandaccuracy.wordpress.com | Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 07:07 PM
Scott: I was employing the very compelling argument "Yeah, well, because." Please don't deign to dignify me with a response.
Posted by: SEK | Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 07:09 PM
Beg your pardon, sir, you are of course in the right. Consider my quibble withdrawn!
Posted by: Finenessandaccuracy.wordpress.com | Sunday, 22 July 2012 at 07:17 PM