Thursday, 06 April 2006

NEXT POST
Best Introduction To . . . Part II Because the sight of the unbroken "Best Introduction To" list inspires vertigo, I've decided to chop it up into smaller disciplinary units and repost an updated version of it. I also want to request that if you think this project worthy, please post a link to this post and a brief explanation of my rationale on your site. (I want to thank John, Richard, Sharon, Lance, Ralph and the New Kid for doing so already.) Or if you're an academic and your departmental listserv isn't too particular about the nature of the emails shot across it, maybe drop your colleagues a line and see if they have any suggestions. Because at this point I've probably exhausted the patience and expertise of my regular 500 readers. I want to reiterate my desire to expand the number and types of categories I have here. For example, I have a numerous medieval categories, but they're almost exclusively English. What's the best book out there on the Provençal troubadours or Andalucían Spain? What about Asia? Or the Indian subcontinent? What about genre? Now for a quick rearticulation of the project: Within every discipline and sub-discipline there is a Book X which most professors recommends to students seeking an intelligent introduction to Subject Y. These are not necessarily books designed to be introductions—The Oxford Companion to Metagrobolism or Introductory Essays on Scandanavian Goregrind and Circumadjacent Genres: A Festschrift in Honor of Bjarni Herjólfsson III—but books recognized by those of requisite expertise as the most comprehensive peek at a particular field. Yes "comprehensive peek" is oxymoronic. That's the point. These books allow any student or autodidact who wishes to acquire functional working knowledge of a field and they come credentialed by scholars in a non-blurby fashion. A beginner who scans book jackets quickly learns that every book "is not merely a genealogy and a critical reassessment of the legacy of everything, but a provocation to our sense of our history and our selves and God and the definitive explanation on why every snowflake is unique and special." If this beginner thumbs through a scholarly bibliography instead, she may as well be preparing for qualifying exams for all the good that obsessive scholarly comprehensiveness will do her. Too little information and she'll miss the point; too much and she'll be overwhelmed. A solid introductory text of the sort faculty members already assign on a regular basis seems to me a happy medium. So without further ado, I present the new and improved "Best Introduction To" list: __________________________________________ Classics & Church Fathers: Homeric: The Best of the Achaeans, Gregory Nagy Presocratic: Aristotelian: Platonic: Images of Excellence , Christopher Janaway Horatian: Augustinian: Patristic: Medieval England: Anglo-Saxon: Early Medieval: Twelfth Century Renaissance: The Envy of Angels: Cathedral Schools and Social Ideals in Medieval Europe, 950-1200 , C. Stephen Jaeger Medieval: The Cambridge History of Medieval English Literature , David Wallace, ed. Late Medieval: Hochon's Arrow , Paul Strohm Early Modern England: Early Modern: English Renaissance: Renaissance Self-Fashioning : From More...
PREVIOUS POST
My Hatred of Chiasmus and My Chiasmus of Hatred [Now spectacularly X-posted to The Valve] Spring Quarter's Critical Theory Emphasis mini-seminar will be led by Nancy Fraser and is entitled "Reframing Justice in a Globalizing World." I speak not to the content of the CTE event (about which I know nothing) but the rhetoric of its presentation. Passing over for the moment the importance of the seminar indicated by continuing activity its title implies—"Fear not! You're part of a movement of reframers. You are not now nor will you ever be reframing alone!"—I focus instead on the title of the third session: "From the Framing of Politics to the Politics of Framing." That's a classic chiasmus . . . even if it lacks the poetry of Yeats' "An Irish Airman Foresees His Death." Yeats plays with the tension produced by chiasmus in "An Irish Airman." Observe the final four lines: I balanced all, brought all to mind, The years to come seemed waste of breath, A waste of breath the years behind In balance with this life, this death. Note the imperfection of the outer the chiasmus. The element of "balance" occupies the initial position in both. The idea behind a chiasmus is to create the impression of order. Yeats exploits this by inverting the already inverted terms. The logic of chiasmus demands the second and third lines above read The years to come seemed waste of breath, A waste of breath the years to come . . . Instead Yeats layers the inversions. The airman's past and future—inversive figures from the present moment—occupy the same position in the chiasmus. Both refer to breaths wasted when compared to the heroic death he anticipates. The airman refers to balance while his words undermine the balance of his rhetorical gesture. Yeats strains against the strictures of chiasmus in order to demonstrate the manner in which life does. The failed establishment of poetic order emphasizes the struggle against what Beckett infamously christens "the mess." The airmen strives "to find a form that accommodates the mess." Only the mess always wins. The contest to create the order one fails to discern in the world will turn tragic in the end. (On this Beckett insists.) A certain breed of literary scholars failed to learn from this. I admit that my initial infatuation with Deleuzian philosophy stemmed from its opposition to all things hierarchical. Its rhizomes embraced the messiness of the world and I liked that. You know: "To every chiasmus inheres a line-of-flight." But then there's the other trend in literary scholarship: that of the unacknowledged or crypto-hierarchy which often sails under the flag of Theory. Certainly the perfectly chiasmatic and orderly theoretical works of literature should not condemn the entire enterprise . . . but in panel and session titles like the ones above I see the creep of the worst infecting the best. Fraser's chiasmus is a clever implement designed to channel the conversation in a sorely limited direction. As Brook Thomas explains of another such chiasmus: There is a tendency to...

Become a Fan

Recent Comments