"Some modern travellers still pretend to find Acephalous people in America."
Ephraim Chambers, Cyclopædia; or, an universal dictionary of arts and sciences, 1753
—
This blogger is a fish.
NEXT POST
House as Bizarro-Quijote Before I begin, I want to acknowledge that there's no way this post lives up to its title. I had this epiphany, you see, and I'm committed to seeing it through to the dirty end; only I'm not certain I can, or that it'd even work if I could. But it's spent the day gnawing at the peripheries of my consciousness, so I'm obliged to address it, lest I sleep less tonight than the 45 minutes I've slept since Thursday morning. (I know what you're thinking. I thought it too. But since I'm not dead or in a coma, I'm going with ischemia. Death of brain tissue. Short-term consequence of paralzying insomnia. Not permanent ... just permanent enough to score me a night's reprieve from hyper-scrutinizing minds.) What was I saying? I was driving at something, I remember. Had to do w—w—w— (calm down, calm down. Don't want to scare yourself into stroking out.) w—w—with House and Don Quijote. I remember now. I wanted to point to the transition from the first season of House to the second and its counterpart between the first and second books of Cervantes' Don Quijote. The problem with my theory is that it depends on some creative mappings and convenient reversals to work. Still, I think the comparison interesting enough to deserve refutation. So here goes: Readers of the Quijote are already familiar with meta-spheric movement between the first and second volumes. The first consists of a conventional romance, by which I mean, a series of adventures connected (slightly) by the central character who has them all. The second volume, however, propels the novel into the aforementioned meta-sphere. In its prologue, Cervantes informs his readers that he will not, as expected, "spit in the face of whoever wrote that second Don Quijote": I'm not planning on to give you any such satisfaction: it's true, insults may make even the humblest hearts thirst for vengence, but the rule will have to let me be an exception. You want me to call him an ass, tell him he's a liar, and impudent, but the idea has never so much as occurred to me: his own sin can punish him, he can eat it with his bread, that's that. (360) Only that's not that. That is the beginning of the modern novel, according to its most illustrious historians, Ian Watt and Michael McKeon. Not only does it saturate the second volume with Cervantes' awareness of romantic convention, it also initiates Quijote's own questioning on those conventions. If you think the Quijote a tragedy, this is the moment it turns tragic. Once the good knight punctures his fantasy, his mental adventures stop resonating historically. He begins a descent that's all the more devestating for its increasingly perfunctory quality. He desperately wants the scrim to drop again, but even when it does, its opacity has given way to a translucence he finds blinding. House inverts this movement from comfortable convention to cold, hard fact. In the first season, the...
PREVIOUS POST
The Very Best of Acephalous 2005 YES, I'M HUMORING YOU My Morning: A Play in One Uncomfortable Act Disadventure, Disaddendum, Dismoralized, & Disinsomnia: A Play (thus far) in Four Acts A Day in the Life of your Average Academic Acephalous' Index: Part I, Part II Fuck Act Theory: Part I, Part II An Undergraduate Honors Thesis Gone Terribly, Terribly Wrong (Now with Annotations) How to Open an Academic Essay: The Series Theory Comics: Freud, Derrida Lying at 30,000 ft. Course Descripton: Piracy Studies 100 Anatomy of a Troll Guidelines for the Proper Defacement of Other People's Stuff [email protected]: An Epistolary Romance Well, Who Would Conservatives Have Us Footnote? Lord Stanley and the Catapult Gambit Keith Herandez Up-Ends a Century of Feminist Progress A Lexigraphical Lament About Probationer Prosody Save Academic Freedom: Expel Hippies, Communists from UCLA "Running Amok, 368" Building Communities through Hate Graduate Students Love Fun Too Dude. Dude? Dude. Dude. (Annotated) Live-Blogging Super Bowl XXXX A Thanksgiving Prayer The Impossible James Bosoms & the Aesthetic Faculty (circa 1885) Life in the Kenning Factory Woe unto Ye Beetles of South America! NARCISSISM UNLEASHED How Acephalous Lost His Head Why He's the Last Person you oughta Respect How He Was Nearly Flattened Headless How He Fared Under the Knife Why He Puts the "der" in "Derridean" Why He's in Favor of Stumbling Why He "Did Theory" Why He Doesn't "Do Theory" Anymore Why Deaf Men Are Breast Men (& The Novelizaton) What the Five Year Rule Is Books He Lives With, Dies By His Day, In Haiku His Life as a John Hughes Film His Bookshelves, Described in Excrutiating Detail How He Coerces Congeniality How He Handles New Data, Old Certainties, & Familiar Places How the ANALOGICAL :: THE PERSONAL How the Personal is Etymological: appaumy bebaste loppard placula hymnicide neoconocon PEDANTIC, BUT EFFECTIVE I. GENERALLY The Theory of the Tyrrany of the Regime of Meaning Citational Difficulties & What They Say, Suggest, Identify or Aver No, You Weren't Thrown a Curve A Xenotheological Romance History of the Great American Novel Live-Blogging the MLA: The Prelude These Walls are Paper-Thin Lindsay Waters Count Contemporary Fiction & The Novel of Ideas The Random Example Who is that Guy? Book-Browsing & Bird Shit I Can't Believe I'm Telling You This Mistaken Assumptions With Nary a Whisper Blogging & Creature Comforts II. THEORETICALLY Ersatz Theoretical Ecumenicalism: Argument in the Age of Mechanical Interaction Historicisms Old & New New Historicism: A Reader's Guide My Hatred of Chiasmus and My Chiasmus of Hatred Useable vs. Historicial Pasts Père Foucault Stomps Fils, Gloats Theory & Literary Modernism III. POPULARLY Festivus and Literary Modernism Deadwood and to Whom its Dialogue is Beholden House as Bizarro-Quijote Teaching Melville in Madrasas Good Grief: Peanuts and Postwar Ennui Philip Roth, Sinclair Lewis & The Detail Hounds The Mirror of Flebotinum Rape in Science Fiction Comic Book Rape IV. DISSERTATIONALLY Stick it to the Historians Doubling London: History Is Become Narrative Grit for Future Gears! Super-Adequate Structural Homologies Historians, Start Your Engines The Consistency Fetish The Horatio...
Does this mean that "this blogger" is your mother?
Posted by: Adam Roberts | Sunday, 10 September 2006 at 03:20 PM
No no no, what it means is that Kaufaman, Acephalous' resident homunculus, noticed that Kaufman was, shall we say, "dead" tired.
Posted by: Scott Eric Kaufmann | Sunday, 10 September 2006 at 03:52 PM