(Many people want to know: "Are you kidding? No new posts until five hundred comments?" The answer: I am not kidding. There will be no new posts until there are five hundred comments on this thread.)
There will be no new posts on Acephalous until there are 500 (five hundred) comments on this one. The person who posts the five hundredth comment wins the honor of suggesting the topic of the subsequent post. Any comments containing the number four, a dollar sign or the open bracket/fancy-open bracket will not count toward the total, as those keys are missing from my keyboard. Suggested discussion topics can be found below the fold.
- Possible reasons for this BLOGWIDE STRIKE ACTION.
- Potential topics for my next post.
- Whether there should be a mandatory word minimum and/or maximum for it.
- Which suggested topic could do the most damage to my academic career and why.
- How much easier it would be to reach 500 comments if LCC commented here.
- The weather and how nice/terrible it has been lately.
- Whether this is a strike-action or a hostage-taking.
- The possibility that 500 comments will not be written, and I'll be forced to either 1) write them myself or 2) close shop.
- Whether comments violating the spirit of the strike/contest should be counted.
- The fact that I am the author of a study.
- The fact that in the '90s when Kurt Vonnegut lived next door to Keith Hernandez, Vonnegut would greet him with a hearty "You're Keith Hernandez!" They would often discuss Hernandez's favorite writer, Victor Hugo, and his favorite Hugo novel, The Toilers of the Sea.
- Rich's pre-suggestion: "Look at this horror. Do clients of sex workers really base their reviews on, in part, whether the sex worker has a Ph.D.? That seems exceptionally perverse. When I was a grad student, the local free paper had a long-running sex chat ad with some line about "We will talk about any subject", and so of course someone joked that he should call and ask about a problem with his dissertation. But in this case, maybe it really would work."
I've seen comment threads reach 300+ comments on more than one occasion. (One LCC-and-coterie-less one, also, the one (on John & Belle Have A Blog?) about who could be a continental philosopher.) But the only one I've seen reach 500 was the highly annoying "Blog" comment thread on Unqualified Offerings. That joke has been done -- into the ground -- so I don't know whether your chances of reaching 500 are that good. Of course, if I start to post each paragraph as a seperate comment, that should add up to quite a few.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 04:42 PM
That's the kind of behavior I'm talking about when I speak of violating the spirit of the contest. And I've seen plenty of posts reach 500 comments; granted, they're all on Atrios or Unfogged, but still, 500 is 500 is 500.
Posted by: Scott Eric Kaufman | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 04:48 PM
One large problem with the idea is that it's going to scroll all the previous comments off the sidebar that shows the most recent comments. Perhaps that's a feature, though. My guess for the reason for the strike action is: 1) dissertation pressure, 2) in order to finally get everyone to stop commenting on the "police the discourse" thread, and erasing its existence from the recent comments sidebar is part of that.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 04:49 PM
Plus, this puts the responsibility for my silence squarely where it belongs: on my commenters.
Posted by: Scott Eric Kaufman | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 04:49 PM
Egad, I could take up 110 comments just by posting each note I've made on half of Bloom's The Anxiety of Influence. That would be cruel and unusual punishment, however.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 04:52 PM
All right, here's what I'll do: I'll take up my parenthetical self-suggestion in that other thread to write a comment about why comment threads on other people's blogs are better than having your own blog. Except each paragraph will be its own comment. I don't think that's cheating; it's not like I'm posting just a couple of words with each one, and I could in theory be adding them with a duration of hours between each as I think of them rather than just typing at high speed.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 04:59 PM
I personally like this one best:
Which suggested topic could do the most damage to my academic career and why.
Posted by: dejan | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 04:59 PM
1. What is a blog? An online, indexed series of posts, each with an indication of the author and a timestamp. Therefore, comment threads are blogs in every essential sense.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:01 PM
2. (damn, typing at high speed is slowed down a lot by comment verification) With comments rather than blog posts, one is spared the annoyance of blog administration. You will never have to choose a format or set up Typepad or some other not-fun waste of time.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:03 PM
3. One also, of course, doesn't have to pay for a blog. This is an uncertain benefit, since there seem to be many free blogging platforms out there in any case.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:04 PM
4. And one is spared the many of the social-administrative costs of blogging. No one will ever Email you to ask you to add them to your blogroll. If you don't link to an article that you're talking about -- well, it's only a comment. No one ever bothers you asking why you haven't commented about X.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:07 PM
5. But by far one of the largest advantages is that you need feel no need to continually produce content. With a blog, people evidently feel guilty for writing too little. With a comment box, the converse is true: people try to make you feel guilty for writing too much. (I'm shameless in this matter, so that doesn't work on me.) It's always easier to write less than write more.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:10 PM
6. (0h drat, Scott said that anything with a numeral, er, two less than this one would be disqualified. There's one gone.) The comment box helps to discourage vanity, a venal sin. (Is it, one, actually? I don't remember.) One doesn't have one's own space that one has to keep maintaining the reputation of.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:13 PM
Wait, wait, if this is a strike action, shouldn't it be collective? Shouldn't that mean we _all_ have to withhold our bloggy labor at our own blogs until Kaufman gets his comments? I didn't get no memo! If I post something at my own blog, would that make me a scab? What if it was a post sending everyone over here to place their bets, er, comments --- would that be scabbing? And can you call a strike and not know what you're striking over until _after_ it's underway? Or is this because time and causality are different over here on the Internets? And, most important, can a cog ever ask too many questions?
Posted by: Sisyphus | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:14 PM
7. And this vanity costs the blogger more than just some possible sort of shame. I think that some people spend significant amounts of time checking there Web hits, their Technorati standing, their Truth Laid Bare ecosystem rank, and so on. With comments, you let all that go.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:15 PM
8. Of course, you do have the problem that sometimes you get caught up in looking at a feed (or refreshing the page or something) to see if anyone has replied to your comment. But bloggers must suffer from the same syndrome, so that seems like neither a comparative advantage nor disadvantage.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:17 PM
9. (Wow, comment verification really does take a lot of time.) Comments are also seen as a social boon. (Usually.) No one wants their blog to go without comments, or they would turn off comments. You could selfishly start your own blog, or you could just write everything on someone else's.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:20 PM
10. Of course, you can get banned from someone else's blog -- the space is not under your control. This can be an advantage, however; it indicates a space that is for whatever reason not amenable to the kind of writing that you want to do. You can always just start commenting on another blog.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:22 PM
11. Also, to pull in one of Scott's concerns above, by commenting on someone else's blog, you are far less likely to be tempted to write about your work. Writing about one's work is probably the topic that is most likely to get people in trouble, either because they break anonymity, or because they reveal something about their work that they were supposed to keep secret.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:24 PM
12. And commenting solves the problem of not having anything to write about. You simply write about whatever other people are writing about. If you want to write about your own topics, you can always seize on some kind of minor or imagined linkage to go off on a long digression about essentially any subject.
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Wednesday, 02 May 2007 at 05:26 PM