Acephalous
"Some modern travellers still pretend to find Acephalous people in America."
Ephraim Chambers,
Cyclopædia; or, an universal dictionary of arts and sciences
, 1753
Home
Friday, 29 June 2007
The First Ever
Acephalous
Podcast: The Eight Meme
What did you expect? Perfection the first time around?
Jun 29, 2007 10:46:42 PM
|
Academia
,
Books
,
Casting Pods
,
Film
,
Literary Theory
,
Literature
,
Shameless Self-Promotion
,
Sports
,
Weblogs
NEXT POST
Debbie Schlussel's Review of SiCKO
I found abdiel's review of Schlussel's review of Live Free, Die Hard via Sadly, No! (Just so you know who I blame.) When I clicked over to Schlussel's site, I noticed his favorite solecism ("It's hard to believe this third sequel to 1988's Die Hard is the fourth in a series") wasn't there. I assumed he'd juiced the stupid for effect, not that she'd edited it after he brought it to her attention. Diligent procrastinator that I am, I read some of her other movie reviews and, needless to say, I can state with certainty that she edited it after he brought it to her attention. Consider her review of SiCKO. She first argues that "HMOs are ... socialized medicine." (I'm no proponent of E-Prime, but her copular slaughter almost convinces me to tack about.) This isn't a good argument, but it has the benefit of being an arguable one. The same can't be said of this: We already have the unworkable system of bad medicine that Moore wants. SiCKO is many things, but there's one thing it isn't: a defense of the status quo. HMOs may be (but really aren't) a form of socialized medicine. That's a (debatable, but wildly incorrect) fact. The claim that "Moore wants the unworkable system of bad medicine we already have" leaves me at a loss, so I'll quote Dorothy Parker: There are times when images blow to fluff, and comparisons stiffen and shrivel. Such an occasion is surely at hand when one is confronted by Dreiser's latest museum piece, Dawn. One can but revise a none-too-hot dialectic of childhood; ask, in rhetorical aggressiveness, "What writes worse than a Theodore Dreiser?"—loudly crow the answer, "Two Theodore Dreisers"; and, according to temperament, rejoice at the merciful absurdity of the conception, or shudder away from the thought. Sadly, the comments to her review leave no room for rejoicing. Shuddering is another story entirely. Moving on: The saddest spectacle in contemporary politics is not, as is often argued, to be caught unawares in one's own hypocrisy. No, the saddest spectacle is to be caught unawares in one's hypocrisy immediately after dismissing someone else for theirs. Case in point: Schlussel anecdotally berates Moore for this moment of self-deprecation: You're right. What can I say? I'm a hypocrite. Who says I'm consistent? She then notes that "personal anecdotes by [sic] former Michael Moore employees [concerning the] lack of appropriate benefits and healthcare" show that his self-deprecation cuts quicker to the truth than he intended. Those anecdotes bear witness to Moore's great lie. He is a hypocrite who wants Americans to do as he says, not as he does. Anecdotes like the one which opens her essay and the ones related by disgruntled employees speak hard truths to even the most jaded powers. They are completely different from those Moore employs in his coverage of Canadian healthcare: Moore shows us the short waiting time and zero cost of healthcare for his friends and relatives in Canada, just a quick drive...
PREVIOUS POST
The Real Victim in the Jena Six Case: David Duke
I've been to Jena. It's an hour north of Bunkie, where I road four-wheelers with anti-semites; and an hour west of Kingston, Mississippi, where I'll some day own land once tilled by slaves.* For the past few weeks, I wanted to write about the Jena Six, but didn't know what to say. How many ways can a person not express surprise?** (Besides, Kevin's mensch-work assuaged my compulsion to address the issue, as through him I found Sylvia, Vox, and Elle.) This isn't to say I haven't been reading and researching. I have. Yesterday, at a popular online forum to which I won't link, I found David Duke complaining about media coverage of the case. He quotes this (from an article no longer online): Still others, however, acknowledge troubling racial undercurrents in a town where 16 years ago white voters cast most of their ballots for David Duke, the former Ku Klux Klan leader who ran for Louisiana governor. Then complains: Well that proves the White folks of Jena must be a really bad bunch. They voted for me about 75 percent. This is one more biased article meant to instill White guilt and shame. In Jena, Blacks a quite small minority commit most of the crimes and many of them are quite beastly, but Whites are the ones painted as devils here! When I talk about the South to people whose experience of racism is almost wholly institutional, they accuse me of trying to change the subject.** Not the case. Only 25 percent of the white population didn't vote for an outspoken white supremacist. This bears repeating with thunder: Only 25 percent of the white population didn't vote for an outspoken white supremacist. Let me put this another way: in the 2004 election, La Salle Parish (of which Jena is the seat) voted overwhelmingly for Bush, to the tune of a 80-20 margin. In the 2003 gubernatorial election, however, Democratic candidate Kathleen Blanco took La Salle by a 60-40 margin over her Republican opponent. Remarkable, no? Not really. This was her opponent: Most of the time, you see his first name in quotation marks, lest anyone forget "Bobby" Jindal's first name is Piyush. However, I will agree with Duke on one thing: the AP article on Mychal Bell's conviction stating that he was found guilty by "an all-white jury" suggests some sort of judicial misconduct. That's not entirely fair. An all-white jury couldn't be avoided: no blacks answered the summons for jury duty. Moreover, given that Jena is 85 percent white (as is La Salle Parish, if they chose to expand the jury pool), it's statistically unlikely a black person would be chosen. Of course, the history of systematic disenfranchisement (only registered voters are summoned) and the whole jury-of-your-peers thing merit consideration ... * Ironically, this land was first settled by immigrants from New Jersey. (That's right: those Swayzes.) It took three centuries, but that land will eventually be back in good Jersey hands. The North shall rise again. **...
Scott Eric Kaufman
1
Following
105
Followers
Search
Become a Fan
My Other Accounts
Facebook
|
scotterickaufman
Twitter
|
scottekaufman
Recent Comments
Drmabuse:
Perhaps the biggest question here is what this ...
|
more »
On
I want to -- but can't -- hate the person who roped me into this conversation
Lucas Picador:
So the problem is that TV shows depict beat cop...
|
more »
On
Louie
, you disappoint me
Jeremy Osner:
Which police force wears orange uniforms?...
|
more »
On
In which SEK seems to be
trying
to get arrested
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Watch till the end folks. Head-on collision, indeed.
Posted by: Jamie | Friday, 29 June 2007 at 10:55 PM
No contest, one of the funniest things you've ever posted. Damn, dude, calm it down!
Posted by: Matt S. | Friday, 29 June 2007 at 11:53 PM
Can't breath can't breath can't breath can't breath! Bravo, headless sir, bravo!
Posted by: Stephen | Friday, 29 June 2007 at 11:55 PM
You can't know how glad I am to see that the more-diss time, less blog-time thing is working out for you. I'll bet your advisors will love this little number.
(That said, despite the fact that I am in the no-blog mode right now, the time saved by not blogging has mostly (98%) been redirected not into reading and writing but rather watching videos of people playing with their new iPhones and playing Bejeweled. I mean, I play Bejeweled. I don't, yet, watch videos of people playing it...)
Posted by: CR | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 12:23 AM
Best. Podcast. Ever!
Every time I thought the stories couldn't get any funnier, they got weirder. Do they crib Arrested Development scenes from your life, or are you in reality a laid-off A.D. writer working up side material?
Posted by: Sisyphus | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 12:58 AM
Whenever you got to the most interesting parts of the stories, some kind of slur in the speech processing software would make the words undecipherable. Which I suppose lets the reader (well, hearer) make up their own endings.
Thus I now know that at 16, Scott broke up with his first serious girlfriend because of his intense attachment to Star Wars (as shown by his earlier conflict, in which the child of a Holocaust survivor informed him that the rebel Gunter Grass walker that he claimed that he had had actually served the Empire) had caused him to cut off his ear, Van Gogh style (it interfered with his Princess Leaia costume), and climb a tree to toss it at her window. She eventually rescued him from being stuck dizzily in the tree, but he and his future wife had their revenge later in philosophy class, where they altered their class notes so that the ex afterwards wrote that Deleuze had always gone by the name "Dizzy".
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 07:36 AM
Very funny! Truly inspiring. . . . And just where did you find that masterpiece statue? - TL
Posted by: Tim Lacy | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 08:31 AM
Tim, the statue's the headless Lenin outside The Red Square in Las Vegas. I just clipped the background from a couple of different shots of it. (I should've normalized the light, so it came from a single source, but didn't feel like firing up the computer with Photoshop on it.)
Really, Rich? I tweaked it for effect in a few places, but I could understand most of it. (I'm not sure whether being deaf makes me more or less of an arbiter in this situation. Can I understand because I'm used to half-hearing things; or because I only half-hear things, anyone who isn't deaf should be able to understand it perfectly?)
Sisyphus, I don't think anyone cribs anything from my life (though it has been more adventuresome of late). Everyone has a hoard of such stories, they just don't spend time learning how to tell them. More than anything else, teaching literary journalism taught me the art of omission.
CR, I don't think they mind what I do with my Friday evening. (Actually, they probably do, but everyone's allowed a weekend every third Friday evening, right?) That said, I came up with this because I've been futzing around with text-to-speech players in order to be more productive. Slip an academic article into one, turn it into an .mp3, then the dishes can be done more productively. (And after years of listening to papers, I can actually catch more than I thought I'd be able to.)
And what's with the iPhone? Christ, people, it's a phone. (Or part phone, at least. I suppose I'd be more excited if I ever used my cell phone, but I don't even know where it is right now.)
Posted by: SEK | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 12:35 PM
Well, at least you've started Against the Day. I'm sure there are brownie points for that.
I didn't really have a problem understanding the dialogue. But alas, there's probably no way to save those of us who use the less-common pronunciation of "Burstein" from the evil depradations of text-to-speech programs.
Posted by: Miriam | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 01:59 PM
There were actually scattered words and phrases I couldn't get -- the name of the Death Star something toy -- the whole reason that you gave for breaking up with someone in the first breakup mentioned -- the name of the surgical procedure, and the book that you didn't finish (Against The Day, I see from the above).
I've never understood the point of podcasts, unless done as this one was for comic effect. Why would anyone want to listen to anything when they can read so much more quickly and easily?
Posted by: Rich Puchalsky | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 02:37 PM
Miriam, be thankful I goosed the thing a bit, otherwise you'd have been "Myron Beerstein."
Rich, I don't understand the appeal of podcasts either. The only ones I listen to are really just radio: This American Life and In Our Time. As someone who until recently had his own place and now writes for an uneven woody collective said in an email: "single-authored blog involves all kinds of cathexis I don't want or need -- from too-devoted fandom all the way to ... deeply fermented alphaliberalmania." I think part of the appeal of podcasts is the celebrity, the too-devoted fandom, the deep fermentation of your objector's objections, &c. It's tangible proof that you are the Blog God you fancy yourself to be.
Thank said, I had such a hoot making that one, I may do a couple more. Maybe a serious: Brief Interviews with the Famous Headless or somesuch. Depends on how much time I have (i.e. if I start sleeping more than four hours a night).
Posted by: SEK | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 04:48 PM
The text-to-speech definitely could be better. My wife uses text-to-speech readers all the time (book readers, screen readers) and I can't remember the last time I heard one that bad. The phrasing was OK (not great, but better than some of the older stuff I've heard), but the enunciation was awful, which is kind of the opposite of the stuff that she uses.
Cute, though.
Posted by: Jonathan Dresner | Saturday, 30 June 2007 at 06:15 PM
Excellent! Great conclusion for the day. I now will vote.
Posted by: hermit greg | Tuesday, 03 July 2007 at 04:52 PM
Or, I would have voted, had the poll not been removed... today?
Posted by: hermit greg | Tuesday, 03 July 2007 at 04:54 PM
Bandwidth issue, apparently. I've had to move pictures to Flickr, cut down on how many images I display, &c. May have to pull down the sidebars too.
Posted by: SEK | Tuesday, 03 July 2007 at 04:56 PM
Ouch. You did get a lot of links today.
Posted by: hermit greg | Tuesday, 03 July 2007 at 05:17 PM
Lame
Posted by: Bucephalus | Wednesday, 18 June 2008 at 04:49 AM
Wait I put the Backstreet Boy’s and Britney Spear’s debut album on pause to hear this?
=)
You're truly a classic fool! -_o
Posted by: Cicero’s golden ass | Wednesday, 18 June 2008 at 04:56 AM