Wednesday, 19 November 2008

Impending Technical Difficulties

When I logged onto TypePad tonight, I was greeted by this message:

Programmingnote

When I clicked on it, I was informed I'd already joined the Beta Team by virtue of them having selected me to join it.  This means I now have a comment feed and, I'm told, my readers are already subscribed to it.  That shouldn't have been done to you on my behalf.  I only ask you accept my sincerest apologies for whatever garbage you receive on account of my fiddling with the settings to make the comment feed an "opt in" feature. 

Nov 19, 2008 9:14:31 PM

4 Comments

Vance Maverick

Hey technical difficulties -- come and get me!

Posted by: Vance Maverick | Wednesday, 19 November 2008 at 10:02 PM

Jonathan Dresner

So far, comments haven't shown up in the bloglines feed. For what it's worth.

Posted by: Jonathan Dresner | Wednesday, 19 November 2008 at 11:17 PM

todd.

Yeah, comments don't seem to be showing up in the main feed, at least so far. But I'm pumped that such a feed is now an option.

Posted by: todd. | Thursday, 20 November 2008 at 12:03 AM

ginevra - TypePad Community Manager

I'm so sorry if we somehow grouped you into something that you didn't want to be in - that's suboptimal to say the least. Do let me know if you need any help fiddling with settings and so forth. :)

Posted by: ginevra - TypePad Community Manager | Thursday, 20 November 2008 at 02:32 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
NPR Today Jen: CALIFORNIA'S BURNING! Pat: That's really interesting, Jen, because you know what else is burning? Felicia Smith of Santa Ana's love for the kind of quality programming you can only find here on NPR. She says it's a constant companion, whether she's on the way to work, running errands, or having unimpassioned sex with her fiancé of eleven years. Bob: Speaking of impending nuptials, Pat, people really value their relationship to NPR. Kat Little from Costa Mesa even compares the difference between being a listener and an active supporter to the hours between when a couple exchanges their vows and the moment the marriage is consummated. "You've already made the commitment," she says, "but only 100 percent of the way. You need to go 110 percent and hit that already." Pat: Funny you should mention math, Bob, because here at NPR listeners will find exclusive maths they can't find anywhere else. Consider when you're on the highway with your secretary, on the way to your favorite bed and breakfast, and you think about the first time you hit that and you wonder whether your infidelity is a personal failing or the product of millions of years of evolution, so you turn on NPR because where else can you get the Loh Down on Science? and you learn not even swans or fruit flies mate for life and start thinking about the sweet inevitable love you're about to make with your secretary. Bob: And maybe when you're done you can buy her the gift of an NPR supporter package where she'll receive not one but two copies of the book Green Living through Healthy Oil and Taxes. It makes a great stocking stuffer for anyone who already listens to NPR as much as you do and received their copy when their membership was automatically renewed for the seventeenth year running. Being a contributor is just simply that convenient. Pat: While we're on the subject of convenience, Bob, if our listener and his secretary's favorite bed and breakfast is anywhere north of Orange County, they'll likely find their route up there to be really tortured by the lines of fires currently engulfing all of Los Angeles County and much of the rest of the Southland. For more on this important story, the kind of story and reporting you can only find on NPR, we turn to Jen on the scene. Jen: CALIFORNIA'S BURNING! CHRIST YOU FUCKER EVERYTHING'S ON FUCKING FIRE! Bob: That's really interesting, Jen, because you know what else is on fire? Copies of Green Living through Healthy Oil and Taxes which the LA Times calls the must-read book this holiday season . . . (x-posted)
PREVIOUS POST
Bolaño's 2666, Part I: "They supplied the stamp of ultraconcrete canonical literature, a nonspectulative literature free of ideas, assertions, denials, doubts . . ." So submits Roberto Bolaño, in the universally praised 2666, about scholars like me. He falls prey here to the Robertson Davies' romance of academic life, in which even minor disagreements are elevated to shrieks against creed as red in claw as they are long in the tooth. Scholars like myself and Bolaño's "insignificant Serbian critic" argue passionately but ultimately purposelessly, for the "ideas, assertions, denials, [and] doubts" we don't have are free of any intent to serve as guide, [are] neither pro nor con, just an eye seeking out the tangible elements, not judging them but simply displaying them coldly, archaeology of the facsimile, and, by the same token, of the photocopier. (55) That Bolaño flips Benjamin the finger here is obvious enough. A work of art emancipated from "its parasitical dependence on ritual" bobs on the restless and relentless tide of technological progress, degraded first by facsimile, later by photocopier, today by scanner, by email, tomorrow by technologies of reproduction yet to be invented. His academics drift aimlessly, a cult without a leader, dependent upon the ritual of reading Benno von Archimboldi (the author whose biography is as mysterious as his novels are spectacular) but incomplete without personal, unmediated contact with the him. They coagulate into a cult and embrace its trappings, its curdled factions, apostasies, anathemas, the evidences of intellectual combat in extremis. Their soft solid masses attend conferences devoted to German literature, chair panels in which their opponents counter their "festive, Dionysian vision of ultimate carnival" by "[speaking] of suffering . . . civic duty . . . [and] humor" (12). They do this often, eleven times by my count, across a Europe overteeming with conferences devoted to high modernist literature about which Bolaño only speaks of obliquely through a critical language emptied of everything but the academic clichés, brood references to solitary men and their signal women. When this sullen lot "[meets] their Moses" (23), a Swabbian journalist who once spoke directly to their absent father, Archimboldi, they discombobulate like jealous underlings: Pelletier (male) and Espinoza (male) bed Norton (female), ignore Morini (cripple), contemplate polyamory and redirect their incestuous agresssion away from their totemized father and toward the hapless Pakistani cabbie disgusted by the frankness of the conversation. The cabbie confessed that London was such a labyrinth, he really had lost his bearings. Which led Espinoza [male] to remark that he'd be damned if the cabbie hadn't just quoted Borges, who once said London was like a labyrinth—unintentionally, of course. To which Norton [female] replied that Dickens and Stevenson had used the same trope long before Borges in their descriptions of London. This seemed to set the driver off, for he burst out that as a Pakistani he might not know this Borges, and he might not have read the famous Dickens and Stevenson either, and he might not even know London and its streets as well as he should, that's why he'd said they were a labyrinth, but he knew very well what decency and...

Scott Eric Kaufman

The Typepad Team

Search

Become a Fan

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments