[T]his year the [Booker] prize should probably go to a science fiction comedy called Yellow Blue Tibia, by Adam Roberts.
I say this not because Adam's a personal friend (although he is), and not because I've edited some of his other novels (although I have), but because it actually is the most intriguing novel I've read this year. Admittedly, I can't say whether it's the best novel published in 2009, because I only read three novels published this year (The City and the City, Inherent Vice, and Asterios Polyp), so I'm limited to saying that Yellow Blue Tibia merely outpaces the latest by Mieville and Pynchon, as well as David Mazzucchelli's decade-in-the-making masterpiece. A quick plot summary before moving on to what makes the book sing.
In 1946, Josef Stalin ordered Konstantin Skvorecky, Ivan Frenkel, and a few other Russian science fiction writers to create a new threat against which the Soviet people could unite (as they had against Germany). They concoct a plot in which invisible radiation aliens invade the U.S.S.R., but it opens when "The Americans launch a rocket to explore space [and the] aliens destroy it with a beam of focused destructive radiation ... Then the aliens blow up a portion of the Ukraine, and poison the ground with radiation" (25). Before they can sketch the invasion out in greater detail, Stalin disbands the group. Years pass. Frenkel accidentally reconnects with Skvorecky shortly before the Challenger disaster. The plan they concocted for Stalin seems to be coming true. Skvorecky, a translator, meets two American scientologists and a Muscovite taxi driver named Ivan Saltykov. There is a murder. Someone or something threatens Chernobyl. Love happens.
That is not, I grant, the most conventional summary of the novel—if they're more your bag you can try here, here or here, or if you're feeling more adventurous, here—but for me to say more would not despoil the novel so much as ruin the pleasure afforded by Adam's narrative gamesmanship. I'm more than happy to spoil a simple plot point, but I would prefer to avoid ruining the interpretive tension created by the contradictory accounts of those simple plot points. Were I to concretize any one of them, I would not only be usurping the role of a character within the novel, I would be reproducing the book's ingenious structural conceit.
Unlike a A Scanner Darkly, in which conflicting realities are focalized through the muddle of drug-induced paranoia, the narrator of Yellow Blue Tibia is fully aware that he lives in a world structured by other people's understanding of reality. From the obsessive-compulsive taxi driver, Ivan Saltykov, who returns to the scene of the crime because he must retrace his path exactly, to the UFO enthusiasts who mistake Skvorecky's denial of the existence of extraterrestrials for an exercise in dialectical thinking, the characters in the novel influence the narrative less through their actions than their rationale for engaging in them. Dramatic irony is both deployed and undermined, resulting in a comedy of ideological errors that ranges from the subversively slapstick (Krapp's Last Tape as performed by an inept Moscow detective) to the deeply structural (the evisceration of Scientology's theoretical and psychology underpinnings).
But, because I'm a blogger and bloggers are narcissists, I want to call attention to the rude portrait Adam drew of me in the novel. In a comment attached to a post from 2005 that has since been rescinded—it was a little too revealing about someone in my department and thus fell into the category of material I wrote as "A. Cephalous" that's not suitable for publication under my own name—Adam posted a link to what he referred to as "a portrait of Mr. Non-Capo." Five years later, he included in Yellow Blue Tibia the following:
The lift door creaked open, and a fantastically shrunken and wrinkled old woman shuffled out, carrying a string bag bulging with provisions. Her head was located in the space directly in front of her torso, as if her neck fitted into the centre of her sternum rather than between her shoulders[.]
Make of that what you will. I choose to be offended. Offended!
Since it is the best of this year, I expect to see it under my Christmas tree. I am sure the author will be happy about that.
Posted by: alkau | Monday, 30 November 2009 at 06:36 PM
Sounds interesting.
Posted by: thor | Monday, 30 November 2009 at 11:42 PM
Unfortunately I'll never find out if it's as good as you say, because the misuse of Cyrillic characters in book and film titles makes my blood boil. Why must you do this, authors and filmmakers, or their marketing people? It doesn't make your work seem more Russian. It makes your work seem ignorant.
Posted by: Ginger Yellow | Tuesday, 01 December 2009 at 04:10 AM
You can't really hold book design against authors; they rarely have control over it.
Posted by: Martin Wisse | Tuesday, 01 December 2009 at 05:10 AM
the misuse of Cyrillic characters in book and film titles
Yeah, I was going to point that out also. As bad as the movie posters everywhere several years ago advertising "My Big Fat Grssk Wedding".
Posted by: onymous | Tuesday, 01 December 2009 at 11:01 AM
You'll have to take it up with my ghost writer. I just added my name to the project; the actual words were written by Bill Ayers.
Posted by: Adam Roberts | Wednesday, 02 December 2009 at 11:52 AM
How do I get Ayers to write stuff for me?
Posted by: P.T. Smith | Wednesday, 02 December 2009 at 01:08 PM
It's the same process formerly used for hiring the A-Team. Why else do you think the A-Team was called the A-Team?
Posted by: Adam Roberts | Wednesday, 02 December 2009 at 05:08 PM
The A-Team was hired via classified ads.
Posted by: Gary Farber | Monday, 14 December 2009 at 10:36 AM
Day made.
There was once a bid on e-bay to have two guys dressed up in ski masks come kidnap you. I was in high school at the time and unable to decide which was funnier, having them kidnap me from class, or having them kidnap the English teacher I hated (it was openly mutual).
Posted by: P.T. Smith | Monday, 14 December 2009 at 01:47 PM
The former might be a misdemeaner; the latter a felony, which is much funnier.
Posted by: Ahistoricality | Monday, 14 December 2009 at 01:53 PM