Tuesday, 23 February 2010

Esteemed architecture critic Warren Ellis on the new US Embassy in London

I think perhaps this building says a little more than it was intended to. In fact, let’s admit it. IT’S A FORTRESS WITH A FUCKING MOAT. It doesn’t say "welcome to a little piece of America, one of the best ideas the world ever had and a country that welcomes the tired and poor and afraid." It says "if you even look at us funny we’ll pour boiling oil on you from the roof. Raise the drawbridge! Release the Mongolian Terror Trout!"

(via)

Feb 23, 2010 5:21:00 PM | Comics

7 Comments

The Necromancer

Hmm...This seems to be continuing a trend. The US embassy in Canada (located in Ottawa) was built a few years ago, and looks like an ironclad warship. Think USS Monitor, but with jailhouse windows...

Posted by: The Necromancer | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 06:50 PM

Ahistoricality

a 12-storey cube clad in a blastproof glass and plastic façade

That alone should have disqualified the design. This isn't architecture; it's milspec engineering.

Posted by: Ahistoricality | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 08:04 PM

John S. Wilkins

I think that we need embassies with firing slits around the top. And actual artillery.

Posted by: John S. Wilkins | Tuesday, 23 February 2010 at 08:56 PM

Adam Roberts

As a Londoner, I can say that the stretch of south bank they're going to build on doesn't look anything like the background to that artist's impression: it's all low-rise grime, warehouses and run-down roads. Google maps gives a sense of it.

Posted by: Adam Roberts | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 06:22 AM

Adam Roberts

Maybe the idea is: 'build an embassy, and corporate glass skyscrapers will flock about it'. Not sure I see the logic in that, myself. But what do I know?

Posted by: Adam Roberts | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 06:25 AM

Bob Reed

Well, I'm more a fan of neo-classical architecture, especially for public buildings, so I'm biased against the whole glass-cube, bauhaus-esque design a priori-regardless of the efficiency of "form following function". I can't imagine who decided in favor of blowing a billion dollars on a facility this ugly. I blame Bush...

I'm glad that for once my subjective opinion is in agreement with a respected critic, I'm feeling more "artsy" already!

Posted by: Bob Reed | Wednesday, 24 February 2010 at 09:43 AM

Martin Shellabarger

I was thinking it was more along the lines of the "Borg Cube" from StarTrek. . .

Posted by: Martin Shellabarger | Saturday, 01 October 2011 at 07:31 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

NEXT POST
Congratulations! Friday Night Lights has leveled up. I have no actual proof that Peter Berg, Brian Grazer and David Nevins—the production team responsible for the NBC drama Friday Night Lights—play role playing games, but having watched the first season of their show, I have a hard time believing that they don't. Solid narrative involves character development, that's a given; but rarely is that development so abrupt that it seems as if the characters have reached a new level. For example, when the paralyzed former quarterback, Jason Street, teaches the new quarterback, Matt Saracen, a fade pattern that Saracen insists he lacks the arm strength to throw, his first two attempts prove that he does, in fact, lack the arm strength to throw that outside fade. Then, as if throwing it two times earned him enough experience points to level up, Saracen hits his receiver's outside shoulder not once, not twice, but consistently, and for the remainder of the season. I initially thought this phenomenon was limited to the acquisition of greater physical gifts, and chalked it up to the production team's desire to show improvement without having to regularly resort to montages; but as the season progressed, it became clear that this logic also applied to the character's emotional and intellectual development. For example, when the wildly irresponsible Tim Riggins first encounters the annoying son of the single mother who moved in next door, he treats the child like all wildly irresponsible teenagers treat annoying third-graders; then, on a day when he is spectacularly hungover, Riggins converses with the boy and temporarily fortifies his Intelligence attribute enough to provide him the mana required to cast an ensouling spell, which he does, resulting in a permanent +1 bump to his total magicka. Has there ever been another series in which character development was this aggressively tiered?
PREVIOUS POST
I now expect to be the Arthur Bellow-Goode Distinguished Chair in Funny Book Studies someday. Rob Farley might not have been born to burgle, but perhaps what we study influences what endowed chair we earn. Consider the curious case of Dr. Ed Diener: Professor Diener is listed as one of the most highly cited psychologists by the Institute of Scientific Information, with over 12,000 citations to his credit ... [His] research focuses on the measurement of well-being; temperament and personality influences on well-being; theories of well-being; income and well-being; and cultural influences on well-being. He has edited three recent books on subjective well-being, and a 2005 book on multi-method measurement in psychology. Diener is currently writing a popular book on happiness ...What endowed chair does this expert in psychological metrics of happiness hold? Ed Diener is the Joseph R. Smiley Distinguished Professor of Psychology at the University of Illinois.Of course he is.* *I'm sure this joke has been beaten into the ground in the circles in which Diener runs, but those circles are neither these circles nor my circles.

Scott Eric Kaufman

The Typepad Team

Search

Become a Fan

My Other Accounts

Recent Comments